145 So. 2d 871 - Lund v. Mathas’s Empirical Analysis
1962
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
June 1964
most recently cited
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 2 U.S.C. § 2A
Relies on Baker v. Carr · Colegrove v. Green · Wood v. Broom · 208 F. Supp. 316 - Sobel v. Adams · Wesberry v. Vandiver
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Population is one of several important factors in apportionment. The varying interests of an area, including economic elements of topography, geography, means of transportation and industrial, agricultural and resort activities, together with numerous other regional characteristics, are to be considered. # ■ * * «”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.