Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 145 SO2D 895 - Saks v. Smith

Saks v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
September 2016
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently September 2016

6 state decisions

20196219701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hassey v. Williams, Et Ux. · Mather-Smith v. Fairchild

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “although the declaratory decree statute is broad in scope and application, nevertheless the rules of pleading require that sufficient facts be stated in a complaint to apprise the defendant of what it is that the plaintiff complains so that he may make such defense as he may have.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.