Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 145 So. 3d 288 - State v. Gates

145 So. 3d 288 - State v. Gates’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
3
states following
May 2024
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Illinois v. Gates · Whren v. United States · Delaware v. Prouse · United States v. Sokolow

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When the statutory limitation (or duty) alleged to have been violated by the officer is not designed to implement fundamental rights of privacy, this court should not employ the exclusionary rule as a device to enforce such legislative directives.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he statutory rules which delineate the territorial zones of responsibility of various law enforcement agencies are not designed to prevent unreasonable invasions of privacy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “would not serve the administration of justice or the purpose of the legislative directing of territorial responsibility.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.