Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

145 So. 3d 88

Christopher v. Christopher

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided December 6, 2013

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · decided 2013-12-06

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 2013

1 state decisions

Relies on Christopher v. Christopher

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2013-12-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1After Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

MOORE, Judge.

¶2The prior judgment of this court has been reversed, and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. See Ex parte Christopher, 145 So.3d 60 (Ala.2013). On remand to this court, and in compliance with the supreme court’s opinion, we hereby reverse the trial court’s judgment and remand the cause for further proceedings, including the entry of an order allowing Carolyn Sue Christopher to “recover from [Charles] Phillip [Christopher] postminority-support payments she has made under the trial court’s order of January 18, 2012.” 145 So.3d at 72.

¶3REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

THOMPSON, P.J., and PITTMAN, THOMAS, and DONALDSON, JJ., concur.
/145/so3d/88 · .json · Public domain