Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 145 SW 656 - Oliver v. Bordner

Oliver v. Bordner’s Empirical Analysis

1912

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 1947
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Crawford v. McDonald · Hardy v. Beaty · Murchison v. White, 54 Tex. 78 (Tex. 1880) · Leatherwood v. Arnold · Carter v. Conner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is a general rule of law in this state that in a collateral proceeding the only contingency in which the judgment of a domestic court of general jurisdiction which has assumed to act can be questioned is where the record affirmatively shows that, jurisdiction did not attach.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.