Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

145 S.W. 914

Hamil v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1912-04-03

<p>Ceiminal Law (§ 1094*) — Appeal—Record— Bills of Exceptions.</p> <p>Where the motion for new trial alleges no reason for reversal which can be considered, unless supported by bills of exceptions and statements of fact, a conviction must be affirmed, in the absence of a statement of fact or bills of exception.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2807, 3204; Dec. Dig. § 1094.*]</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Decided 1912-04-03

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently December 1963

6 state decisions

20191219201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

DAVIDSON, P. J.

¶1This conviction was for rape upon a girl under 15 years of age. The record contains neither statement of facts nor bills of exception. The motion for new trial alleges no reason for reversal of the judgment that could be considered, in the absence of bills of exception and statement of facts.

¶2The judgment is affirmed.

/145/sw/914 · .json · Public domain