Mitten v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 2010
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Mitten v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“may not be admitted in evidence against the defendant in any criminal proceeding.” Tex.Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 46B.007 (Vernon Supp.2004-05). The term”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Mitten v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.