Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 145 SW3D 316 - Roman v. State

Roman v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
January 2017
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 178th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Liteky et al United States · United States v. Grinnell Corp. · United States v. Phillips · Butnaru v. Ford Motor Co. · Kemp v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “of such a nature and extent as to deny the movant due process of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.