Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 145 SW3D 649 - Coleman v. State

Coleman v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

22 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Muscarello v. United States · United States of America v. Javier Ceballos-Torres · United States v. Head · United States v. Zimmer · Patterson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he word “use” typically means that a deadly weapon must be “utilized, employed, or applied in order to achieve its intended result ‘the commission of a felony offense or during immediate flight therefrom,’ “ that “use” could mean “any employment of a deadly weapon, even simple possession, if such possession facilitates the associated felony.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “one can 'use' a weapon without exhibiting it, but not vice-versa.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.