Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 145 TEXCRIM 71 - Fox v. State

Fox v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1942

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
3
states following
July 1986
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently July 1986

10 state decisions

4019421950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Bowser · 35 Tex. Crim. 563 - Givens v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Appellant has a right to have this court consider every question raised by him and such was done in the original opinion and, likewise, each and every question is reconsidered on the motion, but it is not mandatory, practical or advisable to discuss in written opinions each and every question raised in all cases, especially when they have heretofore been definitely decided in the opinions of the court. The legislature certainly was aware of Fox when it enacted Article 44.24(c), supra, as it provided that an abbreviated opinion may be written only”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““While contributory negligence is no defense in such a case, the rights of the defendant are amply protected in the holding that the conduct of the deceased may be considered to determine whether the defendant’s unlawful act was the cause of the death, or to determine whether or not the defendant was negligent.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.