Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 145 Vt. 593 - State v. Allen

State v. Allen’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
2
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably Huminski v. Corsones (2004), In Re CW (1999)

4 federal appellate · 34 state decisions

1601985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · Cooke v. United States · Mayberry v. Pennsylvania · Taylor v. Hayes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “secure both the proper transaction and dispatch of business and the respect and obedience due to the court and necessary for the administration of justice.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[a] rule requiring that all flagrant personal insults be responded to only after delay would undermine the court's dignity and its authority.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “At all times, appellant was under notice that his probation was conditioned upon compliance with Condition 10A. Whether or not Condition 10B was operable or rescinded, Condition 10A always remained in force; it had been properly imposed and was never stricken. Appellant violated the express terms of Condition 10A at his peril.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.