Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 145 Wash. 341 - Antill v. Neely

Antill v. Neely’s Empirical Analysis

1927

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 1937
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Reiner v. Crawford · First Methodist Episcopal Church v. Soden · Seattle National Bank v. Becker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““But it must be remembered that this testimony was offered to show that there never was a delivery of the contract in question, because it was conditioned upon the securing of Mrs. Neely’s approval. This was a condition precedent, and was offered to show that the contract, although signed, never became operative as a contract. Our decisions fully sustain this view. Reiner v. Crawford, 23 Wash. 669 , 63 Pac. 516 , 83 Am. St. 848; Seattle National Bank v. Becker, 74 Wash. 431 , 133 Pac. 613 ; First Methodist Episcopal Church v. Soden, 131 Wash. 228 , 229 Pac. 534 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.