State v. Chapple’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently September 2025
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chambers v. Mississippi · Illinois v. Allen · Rock v. Arkansas · 117 Wash. 2d 369 - State v. DeWeese · United States v. Ives
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“interrupting the proceedings, speaking disrespectfully, and introducing information about his previous trial that might have prejudiced the jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Douglas v. State“lower courts have interpreted [the right to reclamation] to require varying degrees of trial court involvement in the reclamation”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Douglas v. State“waived both his right to be present at trial and his right to testify by refusing to properly conduct himself during trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. LOPEZ v. STATE
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.