145 Wash. 2d 52 - State v. Huffmeyer’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 120 Wash. 2d 585 - State v. Greenwood · 87 Wash. 2d 870 - State v. Striker · 90 Wash. 2d 423 - State v. Peterson · 107 Wash. 2d 59 - State v. Pacheco · 91 Wash. 2d 492 - State v. Alexus
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[p]reliminary proceedings and trial on another charge.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“he or she shall be arraigned within 14 days of the filing of the information; if neither condition exists, arraignment must occur within 14 days of the defendant's first appearance in superior court following the filing of the information. CrR 3.3(c)(1). Within this section of CrR 3.3, the phrase”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hardesty“[P]rosecutors should have at least inquired as to when he would be available for trial in Kitsap County. Further, prosecutors should have contacted King County to inquire as to the progression of Huffmeyer's trial and his availability after the guilty plea.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Swenson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.