State v. Darden’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
September 2011
most recently cited
18 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 99 Wash. 2d 1 - State v. Hudlow · State v. Reed
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]f relevant, the burden is on the State to show the evidence is so prejudicial as to disrupt the fairness of the fact-finding process at trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Jones“The right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses is [also] guaranteed by both the federal and state constitutions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Jones“Darden, 145 Wash.2d at 622 , 41 P.3d 1189 . The State's interest in excluding prejudicial evidence must also”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Jones
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.