Miller v. Jacoby’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 98 Wash. 2d 434 - Wilson v. Steinbach · 25 Cal. 2d 486 - Ybarra v. Spangard · 112 Wash. 2d 216 - Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · 103 Wash. 2d 768 - Hartley v. State · 72 Wash. 2d 73 - Pederson v. Dumouchel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he health care provider failed to exercise that degree of care, skill, and learning expected of a reasonably prudent health care provider at that time in the profession or class to which he belongs, in the state of Washington, acting in the same or similar circumstances,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“[W]hen a surgeon inadvertently introduces into a wound a foreign substance, closes up the wound, leaving that foreign substance in the body, there being no possibility of any good purpose resulting therefrom, that act constitutes negligence.[ [38] ]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Ripley v. Lanzer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.