145 Wis. 2d 695 - Schramek v. Bohren’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district · 35 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently June 2011 · most notably 83 F. Supp. 2d 204 - Nollet v. Justices of the Trial Court of Massachusetts (2000), State v. Smith (2005)
1 federal appellate · 2 district · 35 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Frisby v. Schultz · Gometz v. United States · Weingarden v. United States · 58 Wis. 2d 32 - State Ex Rel. Hammermill Paper Co. v. La Plante · 64 Wis. 2d 6 - Omernik v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Historically, injunctive proceedings have been deemed actions in equity, and must still be regarded as such for the purpose of determining the scope of sec. 5, art. I, notwithstanding the statutory merger of law and equity." Upper Lakes Shipping, Ltd. v. Seafarers' Int'l Union, 23 Wis. 2d 494, 503 , 128 N.W.2d 73, 77-78 (1964). We conclude that because the TRO and injunction as provided for in § 813.12, Stats., are equitable in nature, there is no right to a jury trial under art. I, sec. 5 of the Wisconsin Constitution.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage“attempt to avoid, evade or deny the force and effect of a judgment in an indirect manner and not in a direct proceeding prescribed by law and instituted for the purpose of vacating, reviewing, or annulling it.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Smith · State v. Campbell“based on the premise that the underlying injunction was invalid,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.