Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 146 Ariz. 359 - State v. Rossi

State v. Rossi’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

70
cited by 70 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
March 2010
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 54 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 70 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2010 · most notably Walton v. Arizona (1990), State v. LaGrand (1987)

11 federal appellate · 54 state decisions

3301985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lockett v. Ohio · Santoni v. United States · Local 408, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Labor Relations Board · Stafford v. Oklahoma · Sullivan v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Once the trial judge finds that defendant's capacity was significantly impaired ... a mitigating factor arises which is then weighed against any aggravating circumstances that the trial judge may find to determine whether mitigating factors are sufficiently substantial to call for leniency”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “When a defendant is to be resentenced in death cases, evidence and testimony should be as fresh as possible, and ... relying on a previous hearing on mitigation and aggravation conducted months before the imposition of the death penalty is not recommended.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Before defendant fired the fatal shot, the victim leaned against his bedroom wall and pleaded with defendant, stating 'You have my money, you shot me, what more do you want?' This evinces the victim's mental anguish”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.