Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 146 Ariz. 41 - Bryant v. Silverman

Bryant v. Silverman’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

104
cited by 104 later decisions
7
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 16 district · 55 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 104 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably Torrington Co. v. Stutzman (2001), Hataway v. McKinley (1992)

13 federal appellate · 16 district · 55 state decisions

40019851990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blanton v. General Electric Credit Corp. · Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc. · Blasius v. United States · United States v. Tucker · 67 Cal. 2d 551 - Reich v. Purcell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 104 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In an action for wrongful death, the local law of the state where the injury occurred determines the rights and liabilities of the parties unless, with respect to the particular issue, some other state has a more significant relationship under the principles stated in § 6 to the occurrence and the parties, in which event the local law of the other state will be applied.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) the place where the injury occurred; (2) the place where the conduct causing the injury occurred; (3) the domicil, residence, nationality, place of incorporation and place of business of the parties; and (4) the place where the relationship, if any, between the parties is centered.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “(1) A court, subject to constitutional restrictions, will follow a statutory directive of its own state on choice of law. (2) When there is no such directive, the factors relevant to the choice of the applicable rule of law include (a) the needs of the interstate and international systems, (b) the relevant policies of the forum, (c) the relevant policies of other interested states and the relative interests of those states in the determination of the particular issue, (d) the protection of justified expectations, (e) the basic policies underlying the particular field of law, (f) certainty, predictability and uniformity of result, and (g) ease in the determination and application of the law to be applied.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.