Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 146 BR 185 - In Re Halbert

In Re Halbert’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
June 2012
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently June 2012

1 federal appellate · 2 district ·

100199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 157

Relies on Taylor v. Freeland & Kronz · In Re Cruseturner · In Re Hahn · Kretzer v. DFW Federal Credit Union (In Re Kretzer) · Redfield v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. (In Re Robertson)

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the order for relief under this Chapter.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “to keep the process moving " in any manner. 4 Even worse, the meeting was in fact not adjourned. Whatever business the trustee had in mind, it was concluded as of October 27. B. 14 Having determined the requirements of Rule 2003(e), we turn to consider the conversion issue: whether the conversion of Smith's bankruptcy from a Chapter 11 reorganization to a Chapter 7 liquidation began a new thirty-day period for objections under Rule 4003(b). Rule 4003(b) allows as timely filed only those objections made "within 30 days after the conclusion of the meeting of creditors held pursuant to Rule 2003(a).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Certainly, the conversion of a case initially brought under Chapter 11 to a case under Chapter 7 constitutes an order for relief under the chapter to which the case is converted. However, conversion does not reset the date of the order for relief. 11 U.S.C. S 348(a).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.