In Re Farley, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently October 2022 · most notably Kuske v. McSheridan (In Re McSheridan) (1995), in Re Perry Arden (1999)
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 365 · 11 U.S.C. § 502 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc. · Lindsey v. Louisiana
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) A claim ... is deemed allowed, unless a party in interest ... objects. (b) ... if such objection to a claim is made, the court, after notice and a hearing, shall determine the amount of such claim ... and shall allow such claim in such amount except to the extent that— (6) if such claim is the claim of a lessor for damages resulting from the termination of a lease of real property such claim exceeds— (A) the rent reserved by such lease, without acceleration, for the greater of one year, or 15 percent, not to exceed three years of the remaining term of such lease [[Image here]]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[Rent] includes any payments that relate directly to or increase the value or worth of the property, and are fixed, regular payments.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.