Neumann v. Moretti’s Empirical Analysis
1905
Citation profile
23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently March 2010 · most notably 235 Cal. App. 3d 1 - ABBA Rubber Co. v. Seaquist (1991), 182 Cal. App. 4th 729 - Smith v. Adventist Health System/West (2010)
23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Lambert v. Haskell · San Diego Water Co. v. Pac. Coast S.S. Co. · McCracken v. Harris · Alaska Improvement Co. v. Hirsch
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““If the court or judge deem it proper that the defendant or any of several defendants, should be heard before granting the injunction, an order may be' made requiring cause to be shown, at a specified time and place, why. the injunction should not be granted; and the defendant may, in the meantime, be restrained.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.