146 Cal. App. 2d 234 - Warda v. Schmidt’s Empirical Analysis
1956
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently June 2018
6 federal appellate · 12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Lee v. DeForest · Tillson v. Peters · Egan v. Bishop · 26 Cal. App. 246 - Mercantile Trust Co. of S.F. v. Doe · Gardner v. Rutherford
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although normally entries in an account book must be made at or near the time of the transactions to which they relate and there should be no long delay without satisfactory explanation, an irregularity in that respect is not necessarily fatal to an action on a book account.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“should be the subject of an account between them.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.