146 Cal. App. 4th 216 - Dutra v. Eagleson’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
22 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 79 Cal. App. 4th 986 - Pang v. Beverly Hospital, Inc. · 67 Cal. App. 4th 603 - MARK K. v. Roman Catholic Archbishop · 83 Cal. App. 4th 739 - Black v. Department of Mental Health · 40 Cal. App. 4th 1177 - Lent v. Doe · Tietge v. Western Province of the Servites, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“because that ground was never raised in [the] demurrer, we cannot rely on it and must reverse”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Subdivision (b)(2) extends past a plaintiff's 26th birthday claims against a nonperpetrator defendant who is or was in a specified relationship with the perpetrator-'employee, volunteer, representative, or agent'-and who, 'knew or had reason to know, or was otherwise on notice' of the perpetrator's 'unlawful sexual conduct' and 'failed to take”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“within eight years of the date the plaintiff attains the age of majority or within three years of the date the plaintiff discovers or reasonably should have discovered that psychological injury or illness occurring after the age of majority was caused by the sexual abuse, `whichever occurs later.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.