Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 146 CONNAPP 701 - State v. Hodkoski

State v. Hodkoski’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · State v. Chong Chung · State v. Coleman · State v. Colvin · State v. Crocker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[F]or this court judiciously and efficiently to consider claims of error raised on appeal ... the parties must clearly and fully set forth their arguments in their briefs. We do not reverse the judgment of a trial court on the basis of challenges to its rulings that have not been adequately briefed.... The parties may not merely cite a legal principle without analyzing the relationship between the facts of the case and the law cited.... [A]ssignments of error which are merely mentioned but not briefed beyond a statement of the claim will be deemed abandoned and will not be reviewed by this court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.