Love v. Scatcherd’s Empirical Analysis
146 F. 1 · 1906
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2004
3 federal appellate · 12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Neel v. Pennsylvania Co. · Beuttell v. Magone · Minahan v. Grand Trunk Western Ry. Co. · Phenix Ins. v. Kerr
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“■ “We are thinking of taking our property out of the market, but if you have anybody who is reliable, and with whom, you can put us in communication regarding this property, we would protect you on a commission of 5 per cent. We would want to have an opportunity to look up the party as to his responsibility before making prices, and if this were satisfactory, before doing so, we would arrange all matters in detail with you, in any event we. would agree to protect yop in case you furnish us names,” etc.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Payseno v. Swensen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.