Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 146 F.1d 20 - Herold v. Shanley

Herold v. Shanley’s Empirical Analysis

146 F. 20 · 1906

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
February 1947
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 1947

5 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

6019061910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Horace Dunbar v. Lottie E Dunbar · Redfield v. Ystalyfera Iron Co. · Erskine v. Van Arsdale · William Vanderbilt v. Ferdinand Eidman · 9 N.J. Eq. 702 - Gifford v. Thorn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““thereupon I direct that all the rest, residue and remainder of my estate, real and personal, subject to the provisions above written for the benefit of my grandson, shall be distributed and divided among my three sons, share and share alike.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “•‘Remainders over were limited in case he (Alfred G.) should die before reaching the age of 30 or 35, but these were not regarded as material to the construction of the clause.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.