Vogel v. Warsing’s Empirical Analysis
146 F. 949 · 1906
Citation profile
10 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1946
10 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hammer v. Garfield Mining & Milling Co. · North Noonday Mining Co. v. Orient Mining Co. · McEvoy v. Hyman · Empire State-Idaho Mining & Developing Co. v. Bunker Hill & S. Mining & Concentrating Co. · Flavin v. Mattingly
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It lias been bejd that under such circumstances the certificate of location creates a presumption of discovery of mineral and of a valid location. Harris v. Equator Mining & Smelting Co. (C. C.) 8 Fed. 863 , 5 McCrary, 14 ; Cheesman v. Shreeve (C. C.) 40 Fed. 791 ; Cheesman v. Hart (C. C.) 42 Fed 98 . Especially should such a presumption be indulged in a summary proceeding instituted at the beginning of a suit, Where the granting or withholding of an injunction depends upon facts presented by affidavits and rests largely in the discretion of the trial court, and where a subsequent locator attacks the title of the prior locator or that of his successor in interest.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.