Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

146 F.2d 110

Docket No. 9781.

Driver v. Shellmar Products Co.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Dec. 14, 1944.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1944-12-14

2 counsel of record

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1944-12-14

¶1Warren H. F. Schmieding, of Columbus, Ohio, for appellant.

¶2Franklin M. Warden and Cromwell, Greist & Warden, all of Chicago, Ill., and Corbett, Mahoney & Miller, of Columbus, Ohio, for appellee.

¶3Before HAMILTON, MARTIN, and McAllister, circuit judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5After oral argument and upon consideration of briefs filed, it is ordered that the decree of the District Court be affirmed for the reasons stated in the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. It does not appear from the record that there has been an error of law or conclusion of fact unwarranted by evidence.

/146/f2d/110 · .json · Public domain