In re Laskin Bros.’s Empirical Analysis
146 F.2d 308 · 1944
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently February 1968
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on California Packing Corp. v. Tillman & Bendel, Inc. · In re Keller, Heumann & Thompson Co. · Philadelphia Inquirer Co. v. Coe · Skookum Packers' Ass'n v. Pacific Northwest Canning Co. · Ryon v. Hathaway
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“* * * In refusing to register a prohibited mark the Commissioner of Patents acts as the guardian of the public interests and the parties by their deeds or agreement cannot confer upon him the power to do that which he is prohibited from doing under the statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.