Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 146 F.2d 428 - Bowles v. Huff

Bowles v. Huff’s Empirical Analysis

146 F.2d 428 · 1944

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
April 1986
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently April 1986

8 federal appellate · 2 district ·

9019441950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hecht Co. v. Bowles · Meredith v. City of Winter Haven · Brown v. Hecht Co. · Brown v. Hecht Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘We agree that the cessation of violations, whether before or after the institution of a suit by the Administrator, is no bar to the issuance of an injunction under § 205(a). But we do not think that under all circumstánces the court must issue the injunction or other order which the Administrator seeks.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.