Bowles v. Ray

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Jan. 5, 1945.

Rehearing Denied March 26, 1945.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1945-01-05

2 counsel of record

Relies on Bowles v. Glick Bros. Lumber Co.

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1945-01-05

¶1Thomas I. Emerson, Deputy Adm’r for Enforcement, Fleming James, Jr., Director, Litigation Division, David London, Chief, Appellate Branch, and Albert Dreyer, Atty., OPA, all of Washington, D. C., W. Dunlap Cannon, Jr., Regional Litigation Atty. of San Francisco, Cal., and H. Eugene Breitenbach, District Enforcement Atty., OPA, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

¶2Pearlson & Singer and Morris Lavine, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

¶3Before WILBUR, DENMAN, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5On the authority of Chester Bowles, Administrator, v. Glick Brothers Lumber Co., et al., 9 Cir., 146 F.2d 566, the judgment of dismissal is reversed.

Download

Copy

Embed on your site

Hover to preview · click to copy the code

Search Wikipedia →

Court

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Panel

William Denman
Chief Judge
Curtis Dwight Wilbur
Circuit Judge
WH
William Healy
Circuit Judge
PER CURIAM.
By the court
Read opinion →

Counsel

Thomas I. Emerson, Deputy Adm’r for Enforcement, Fleming James, Jr., Director, Litigation Division, David London, Chief, Appellate Branch, and Albert Dreyer, Atty., OPA, all of Washington, D. C., W. Dunlap Cannon, Jr., Regional Litigation Atty. of San Francisco, Cal., and H. Eugene Breitenbach, District Enforcement Atty., OPA, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Pearlson & Singer and Morris Lavine, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.