Slaven’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently April 2024
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Olano · Johnson v. Zerbst · Swift & Co. v. United States · California Franchise Tax Board v. MacFarlane · Nashville St Ry Co v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A party to a consent decree or other judgment entered by consent may not appeal unless it explicitly reserves the right to appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Campbell“An exception to this longstanding rule exists where a party specifically preserves its right to appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Campbell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.