No. 97-5047’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently August 2024
2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc. · Redland Soccer Club, Inc. v. Department of Army of United States · Request for Assistance from Ministry of Legal Affairs of Trinidad and Tobago Azar · Malev Hungarian Airlines v. United Technologies International Inc. · Euromepa v. Esmerian, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he reference in § 1782 to the Federal Rules suggests that under ordinary circumstances the standards for discovery under those rules should also apply when discovery is sought under the statute.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The district court’s authority to order [a person residing or found in a district] to give testimony “for use in a proceeding in a foreign .., tribunal” stems from § 1782. 28 U.S.C. § 1782 (a). Section 1782(a) then provides that, in its order granting § 1782 assistance, the district court “may prescribe the 'practice and procedure ... for taking the testimony or statement or producing the document or other thing.” Id. (emphasis added). This “practice and procedure” may be “in whole or part the practice and procedure of the foreign country or the international tribunal.” Id. To the extent that the district. court does not otherwise prescribe the practice and procedure, § 1782(a) provides that “the testimony or statement shall be taken, and the document or other thing produced, in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.” Id.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Our discussion is not intended to suggest that Bayer is necessarily entitled to have its application granted. That determination will have to await the district court's proper exercise of its discretion on remand when it will be free to consider the relevance of factors not before us, such as the timeliness of Bayer's application and appropriate measures, if needed, to protect the confidentiality of the materials.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.