Reed v. Reno’s Empirical Analysis
146 F.3d 392 · 1998
Citation profile
7 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently October 2024
7 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · United States v. Sherwood · United States v. King · Hill v. United States · Kanemoto v. Reno
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“whether the statute is silent or ambiguous with respect to the specific issue before it; if so, the question for the court [is] whether the agency's answer is based on a permissible construction of the statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Singh v. Gonzales“construction of the statute [that] it administers”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Singh v. Gonzales
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.