Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 146 F.3d 430 - Payne v. Milwaukee County

Payne v. Milwaukee County’s Empirical Analysis

146 F.3d 430 · 1998

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
October 2012
most recently cited

28 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently October 2012 · most notably Sheehan v. Donlen Corp. (1999), Bruso v. United Airlines, Inc. (2001)

28 federal appellate ·

290199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · Connick v. Myers · Chick Kam Choo v. Exxon Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]e 'review the evidence in a light most favorable to the non-moving party to determine whether there was no legally sufficient evidentiary basis for a reasonable jury to find for the non- moving party.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Credibility determinations, the weighing of the evidence, and the drawing of legitimate inferences from the facts are jury functions, not those of a judge, whether he is ruling on a motion for summary judgment or for a directed verdict.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[W]e do not reach the question of an employer's reasoning for an adverse employment action until there is a rebuttable presumption of discrimination, that is, after the employee establishes a prima facie case of discrimination.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.