Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 146 F.3d 726 - Stanton v. Benzler

Stanton v. Benzler’s Empirical Analysis

146 F.3d 726 · 1998

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
October 2011
most recently cited

6 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently October 2011

6 federal appellate ·

80199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Estelle v. McGuire · O'NEAL v. McAninch

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]t is not the province of a federal habeas court to reexamine state-court determinations on state-law questions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.