¶1 Juanita Sims filed a motion to reconsider more than ten days after dismissal of her Title VII action as untimely, attaching her right-to-sue letter from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). The district court 1 denied her motion, and Sims appeals. Liberally construing her motion to reconsider as a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion, we conclude the district court did not *79 abuse its discretion in denying reconsideration. See Sanders v. Clemco Indus., 862 F.2d 161, 164-65, 169 (8th Cir.1988) (construing reconsideration motion filed more than 10 days after entry of judgment under Rule 60(b); appeal from denial of Rule 60(b) motion does not raise underlying judgment for review, and review is for abuse of discretion); Brooks v. Ferguson-Florissant Sch. Dist., 118 F.3d 903, 904-05 (8th Cir.1997) (where Title VII action was dismissed as untimely in light of date alleged for receipt of EEOC right-to-sue letter, it was not abuse of discretion to deny plaintiffs reconsideration motion, in which he attempted to correct date by referring to mailing date of EEOC letter; “while [plaintiff] represented himself and may have had difficulty with procedural rules, the motion to dismiss provided him notice that the receipt date was critical”).
¶2 Accordingly, we affirm.