Randolph v. Randolph’s Empirical Analysis
1941
Citation profile
43 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently October 1996 · most notably 280 So. 2d 431 - Hoffman v. Jones (1973), 61 So. 2d 420 - Ripley v. Ewell (1952)
43 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Phinney v. Phinney · Hopkins v. Hopkins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When the reason for any rule of law ceases, the rule should be discarded.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““Appellee contends that a proper interpretation of the statute so quoted bars any offending spouse from alimony if she was the actuating cause of the divorce, and that since he was granted a divorce for defendant’s cruelty, she is not entitled to alimony. He relies on Phinney v. Phinney, 77 Fla. 850 , 82 So. 357 , to support this contention. “We do not so interpret the statute and the last cited case when read in the light of the statute does not warrant that interpretation. The only class barred absolutely from alimony is the adulterous wife. In all other cases, the chancellor may award such amounts for alimony as in the ‘circumstances of the parties and nature of the case may be fit, equitable and just.’ Aside from adultery, the circumstances and conduct of an offending spouse might be such as to bar her from alimony but this is a matter solely in the discretion of the chancellor governed by equity and justice and the condition of both parties. All these factors the chancellor should consider and adjudicate the claim for alimony accordingly.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cowan v. Cowan““The extent to which man has been the victim, of woman’s wit and diplomacy is ample to offset his bragging. Eve cast a spell over Adam and he took the forbidden apple. Barak would never lxave been heard of but for the urge of Deborah, and Jael, the wife of Ileber the Kenite, slew Sisera by driving a tent peg through his temples. Samson fell for the duplicity of Delilah and tradition tells us that Cleopatra made a fool of Caesar and Mark Antony. Peggy O’Neal was the bane of Jackson’s kitchen cabinet.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hicks v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.