Malkin v. Dubinsky’s Empirical Analysis
1956
Citation profile
6 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently March 2018
6 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Arnstein v. Porter · Universal Pictures Co. v. Harold Lloyd Corp. · West Publishing Co. v. Edward Thompson Co. · Rose v. Connelly · Millstein v. Leland Hayward, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“any one similarity taken by itself seems trivial.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Williams v. Gaye · Williams v. Gaye
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.