Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 146 FSUPP 44 - Grindle v. Welch

Grindle v. Welch’s Empirical Analysis

1956

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
December 1957
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2201

Relies on Westinghouse Electric Mfg Co v. Formica Insulation Co · Becher v. Contoure Laboratories, Inc. · Kennedy v. Hazelton · United States Appliance Corp. v. Beauty Shop Supply Co. · Zachs v. Aronson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Welch commenced production of the sticks and made his first delivery to Pan American on August 12, 1948. That date marked the beginning of public use of the dipstick. Grindle was soon thereafter assigned to other duties and took no further interest in the dipstick. Thereafter, on August 17, 1949, Welch filed for a patent on the dipstick swearing that he was the true inventor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the operation of the device is the same as that used by children playing with straws”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “* * * could have accomplished the substitution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.