146 F. Supp. 2d 194 - Kinzer v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · United States v. Diebold, Inc. · Parratt v. Taylor · Will v. Michigan Department of State Police · Wilson v. Layne
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“it would not be `objectively reasonable' for an arresting officer to intentionally withhold exonerating information from the prosecutor,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Kinzer v. Jackson“as to whether Harris made efforts to inform ADA Calderone, or whether [Harris] intentionally withheld proof of Kinzer's innocence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Kinzer v. Jackson“[P]robable cause to arrest ... is a complete defense to an action for false arrest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Kinzer v. Jackson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.