¶1 The plaintiffs brought suit on two notes, seeking to recover principal and interest due them. The defendants answered and counterclaimed for fraud in the procurement of the sale of a certain business which was the underlying basis of the two notes. This appeal followed the grant of summary judgment for the plaintiff. Held:
¶2 From an examination of the present record there are no grounds, for reversing the trial judge’s finding that because of defendants’ actions they ratified any alleged *555 fraud on the part of the plaintiff and now are estopped to assert such defense. Massey v. Electrical Wholesalers, 137 Ga. App. 829 (224 SE2d 811); Manning v. Wills, 193 Ga. 82, 90 (3) (17 SE2d 261). Accord, Tuttle v. Stovall, 134 Ga. 325 (67 SE 806); Gibson v. Alford, 161 Ga. 672, 673 (5) (132 SE 442); Brown v. Nixon, 231 Ga. 619, 622 (203 SE2d 200).
¶3 Judgment affirmed.