State v. Carlton.’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

6 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Order Re: January 22, 2021 Further Evidentiary 3/ HRAP Rule 36(c)(1) provides, in relevant part: (c) Effective date of intermediate court of appeals' judgment. The intermediate court of appeals' judgment is effective as follows: (1) if no application for writ of certiorri is filed, (A) upon the thirty-first day after entry or (B) where the time for filing an application for a writ of certiorari is extended in accordance with Rule 40.1(a) of these rules, upon the expiration of the extension[.] 7 NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAII REPORTS OR THE PACIFIC REPORTER Hearing Pursuant to ICA's Memorandum Opinion, Filed February 24, 2020”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. D.L. v. C.L.

2. “Allocution is the defendant's right to speak before sentence is imposed. The right of presentence allocution is an important constitutional right guaranteed under the due process 5 NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER clause, article I, section 5, of the Constitution of the State of Hawai#i.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Lewi

3. “[T]he intermediate court of appeals' judgment cannot be effective and jurisdiction cannot revert to the court . . . from which appeal was taken until the time for filing the application [for a writ of certiorari] has expired . . . .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. D.L. v. C.L.