Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 146 HAW 328 - DL v. CL.

DL v. CL.’s Empirical Analysis

2020

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
January 2025
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In the Interest of Doe · Fisher v. Fisher · Molokoa Village Development Co. v. Kauai Electric Co. · 875 So. 2d 383 - Perlow v. Berg-Perlow · Cleveland v. Cleveland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Order to Submit Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “disturb the family court's decision unless (1) the family court disregarded rules or principles of law or practice to the substantial detriment of a party litigant; (2) the family court failed to exercise its equitable discretion; or (3) the family court's decision clearly exceeds the bounds of reason.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[I]t is well-settled that an appellate court will not pass upon issues dependent upon the credibility of witnesses and the weight of the evidence; this is the province of the trier of fact.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.