Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 146 Idaho 868 - Cramer v. Slater

Cramer v. Slater’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
4
states following
June 2023
most recently cited

1 district · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently June 2023 · most notably Bach v. Bagley (2010), Puckett v. Mt. Carmel Regional Medical Center (2010)

1 district · 24 state decisions

160200920102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Deutsch v. Shein · Alegria v. Payonk · Baxter v. Craney · Coghlan v. Beta Theta Pi Fraternity · Lundy v. Hazen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““All disputed facts are to be construed liberally in favor of the nonmoving party, and all reasonable inferences that can be drawn from the record are to be drawn in favor of the nonmoving party.” Mackay v. Four Rivers Packing Co., 145 Idaho 408, 410 , 179 P.3d 1064, 1066 (2008). If reasonable people might reach a different conclusion from conflicting inferences based on the evidence then the motion must be denied. Id. “If the evidence is conflicting on material issues or supports conflicting inferences, or if reasonable minds could reach differing conclusions, summary judgment must be denied.” Doe v. Sisters of the Holy Cross, 126 Idaho 1036, 1039 , 895 P.2d 1229, 1232 (Ct.App.1995).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “so highly unusual that we can say, as a matter of law that a reasonable [person], making an inventory of the possibilities of harm which his conduct might produce, would not have reasonably expected the injury to occur.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[T]rue proximate cause deals with 'whether it was reasonably foreseeable that such harm would flow from the negligent conduct.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.