Bartlett v. Manor’s Empirical Analysis
1897
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 49 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently February 1992 · most notably Evansville Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. Winsor (1897), 135 Ind. App. 60 - Donnella, Admrx. v. Crady (1962)
8 federal appellate · 49 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on The Harrisburg · McDonald v. McDonald · Storms v. Stevens · Luther v. Luther · Ryan v. Ray
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““However, it is fully established that when a right is given and the procedure for its enforcement is provided by a special statute, the procedure so provided excludes resort to another or different procedure. Harrison Nat. Bank v. Culbertson (1897), 147 Ind. 611 , 45 N. E. 657 , 47 N. E. 13 ; Edgerton v. Huntington School Twp. (1890), 126 Ind. 261 , 26 N .E. 156; Ryan v. Ray (1886), 105 Ind. 101 , 4 N. E. 214 ; Storms v. Stevens (1885), 104 Ind. 46 , 3 N. E. 401; Fisher v. Tuller, 122 Ind. 31 , 23 N. E. 523 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Redmon“"As long as the bar stands against the contest, we have a barrier against establishing a will to substitute for it. Substitution includes as much the overthrow of one as the proof that another existed. The relief sought includes both, and neither demand can stand without the other. Since contest is forbidden, and the will of 1855, with its probate, must stand, substitution becomes impossible."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““It cannot be seriously questioned that our statute of wills is special with reference to the right of contest, that it creates a right not existing in its absence, and that the right is given upon the condition that it be exercised within three years. As to this right it cannot be doubted, we think, that the general statute of limitations has no effect.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Medill v. Snyder
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.