146 Ind. App. 382 - Jackson v. Beard’s Empirical Analysis
1970
Citation profile
39 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently March 2006 · most notably Corsetti v. Stone Co. (1985), 163 Ind. App. 201 - Collins v. Dunifon (1975)
39 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 145 Ind. App. 159 - Northern Indiana Public Service Co. v. Otis · Pickett v. Kolb · City of Terre Haute v. Deckard · 107 Ind. App. 253 - J. C. Penney, Inc. v. Kellermeyer · 134 Ind. App. 572 - Indianapolis Transit, Inc. v. Moorman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘Accordingly, where evidence on a certain issue is introduced by one party, and it appears likely that the other party will be prejudiced unless he is permitted to introduce contradictory or explanatory evidence, such evidence should be admitted. The admission of contradictory or explanatory rebuttal evidence that is otherwise inadmissible depends on the court’s judgment of the prejudice that will result if such evidence is not permitted, . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ingram“[t]he [plaintiff] having opened the gate on the matter of reduced income as a result of the [injury] complained of, the [defendant] has the right to drive through and to cross examine on the issues raised by [plaintiff].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““ ‘Compensation for the loss received by plaintiff from a collateral source, independent of the wrongdoer, as from [an employment contract], cannot be set up by the wrongdoer in mitigation of damages.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.