Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 146 KAN 247 - Koch v. Wolf

Koch v. Wolf’s Empirical Analysis

1937

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 1948
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Smith v. Nyburg · Rishel v. County of McPherson · Kunze v. Kunze · Mayer v. Taylor · Agricultural Insurance Co. of Watertown v. Biltz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We conclude that the oral contract set out in the petition of the plaintiff was such as, if successfully established, would nullify the effect of the will and was therefore a contest of the will in question , and the action was barred by the statute of limitations as to contests of wills, and the fact that it only affected one-third of the property of the deceased would not make it any the less a contest of the will.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.