Fleming v. Campbell’s Empirical Analysis
1937
Citation profile
2 district · 15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently August 1993
2 district · 15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Berryhill v. Stufflebean · Nelson v. Schippel · Sheldon v. Board of Education · Sipes v. Pessemier · Hudson v. Riley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Other allegations stricken from the first cause of action, and from which ruling an appeal was taken, pertain to the alleged fraud on which the second cause of action was based. That those allegations pertained to fraud is admitted in plaintiff’s brief. They were properly stricken from the first cause of action, which was an action for damages on the ground of alleged breach of contract. A cause of action must be drawn on a definite theory. (Turner v. Jarboe, 145 Kan. 202 , 64 P. 2d 26 .) The allegations, if deemed necessary by plaintiff, should have been made in the second cause of action.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Fleming v. Campbell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.